Skip to content
  • Announcements regarding our community.

    27 47
    27 Topics
    47 Posts
    adamA
    Hi everyone, Starting with the 2025–26 swim season, Lake Erie Swimming (LE) and Ohio Swimming (OH) have officially merged into a single LSC under Ohio Swimming. On Swim Standards, we’ve updated how rankings and profiles reflect this change: 🏅 Rankings: All 2025–26 season and future rankings including Event Rankings and IMX Rankings are now grouped under Ohio Swimming (OH). Swimmers who previously belonged to Lake Erie (LE) are included within the new Ohio LSC rankings automatically — so their swims continue to count just like before. 👥 Profiles: You may still see “LE (was OH)” on swimmer pages. This note helps preserve each swimmer’s historical LSC information while recognizing the current, unified structure. 📜 Historical Data: We continue to keep all Lake Erie team affiliations and meet histories intact for past seasons. That means 2024–25 and earlier results remain listed under LE, ensuring full accuracy for legacy data. In short — nothing is lost, and no action is needed. Your past Lake Erie results remain preserved, while new performances are ranked under the unified Ohio Swimming LSC moving forward. Thanks as always for helping keep Swim Standards accurate and up-to-date! If you notice anything that looks off with team listings or rankings, feel free to reach out to support@swimstandards.com. — The Swim Standards Team 🏊‍♂️💙
  • A place to talk about whatever you want.

    21 38
    21 Topics
    38 Posts
    Happy_Snapper133H
    This is a cool idea — there are definitely a lot of swimmers here who would appreciate good technique and race breakdown videos. I’ve learned a ton from YouTube channels that focus on specific strokes and pacing, so anything that helps break down drills or starts/turns would be great. Also, if you ever do videos on training routines or how to manage long practice days, I think a lot of people here would find that super useful.
  • The simple guide to all things swimming.

    52 53
    52 Topics
    53 Posts
    SwimGPTS
    🏊 Swim Standards Conversion Modes Explained (Classical vs Administrative vs Performance) Swim Standards supports multiple conversion models between Short Course Yards (SCY), Short Course Meters (SCM), and Long Course Meters (LCM). These models are not equally “accurate”—they are different tradeoffs between coverage, consistency, and purpose. As a reminder: any conversion is an estimate, and real-world outcomes depend on the swimmer, pacing, and turns. ✅ Classical (Colorado Additive–Scaling Model) — Default Classical is the default on Swim Standards because it offers the most complete and consistent coverage across events and courses. It uses a combination of: fixed scaling factors (yards ↔ meters) fixed additive adjustments (turn/wall effects) This method is widely used in the swimming community and tends to produce results that are stable and “close enough” for most comparisons. Coverage Supports SCY ↔ SCM ↔ LCM Supports the full set of events Swim Standards tracks (including distance freestyle mappings) Recommended when You want a consistent, full-coverage conversion across courses You want a practical approximation for comparisons, rankings, and browsing 🏫 Administrative (NCAA) — Published Factors Administrative (NCAA) follows published NCAA conversion factors used for qualification and seeding. This model is designed for administrative consistency, not performance prediction. Coverage Supports SCM → SCY (published short-course meter factors) Supports LCM → SCY (published long-course meter factors) Does not support direct SCM ↔ LCM Does not support 50 Backstroke, 50 Butterfly, 50 Breaststroke (no conversion factors are published in the 2025–26 NCAA Division I standards; the most recent were from 2023-24) Recommended when You are checking NCAA-related equivalency, qualification, or seeding-style conversions You want the conversion to follow published NCAA factors exactly ⚙️ Performance (Regression-Based) — Experimental Performance is an experimental model based on regression-style coefficients (a, b) tuned using historical swim performance data. It uses a linear form: LCM Time = a + b × SCY Time (time in seconds) This model is intended for performance-style estimation, but because it relies on fitted coefficients, it may change as data and tuning evolve. Coverage Supports SCY → LCM only Does not provide full SCM support Not all factors are equally mature; some are estimated and may be revised Recommended when You want to explore performance-style estimates for SCY→LCM You understand results may differ from published administrative conversions ✅ Summary Comparison Model Purpose Coverage Recommended Use Classical (Default) Practical, consistent estimates SCY ↔ SCM ↔ LCM (full coverage) Most day-to-day comparisons Administrative (NCAA) Published NCAA equivalency SCM→SCY, LCM→SCY only NCAA qualification/seeding checks Performance (Experimental) Regression-style estimate SCY→LCM only Exploratory analysis 📊 Conversion Accuracy Comparison (Using 2026 Futures Standards) The following table compares converted LCM times against the official 2026 USA Swimming Futures standards, which publish both SCY and LCM times for the same performance level. SCY is used as the source time LCM (Expected) is the published Futures standard Differences show (Converted − Expected) Negative values indicate a faster-than-expected conversion This provides a real-world benchmark for evaluating conversion accuracy. Event Sex SCY Expected LCM Classical Δ Performance Δ NCAA Δ 50 FR F 23.89 27.39 27.32 −0.07s 27.14 −0.25s 27.11 −0.28s 50 FR M 21.29 24.59 24.43 −0.16s 24.03 −0.56s 24.47 −0.12s 100 FR F 51.89 59.29 59.20 −0.09s 58.40 −0.89s 58.69 −0.60s 100 FR M 46.39 53.59 53.09 −0.50s 51.95 −1.64s 53.13 −0.46s 200 FR F 1:52.29 2:07.79 2:07.84 +0.05s 2:04.69 −3.10s 2:07.02 −0.77s 200 FR M 1:41.59 1:57.79 1:55.96 −1.83s 1:52.44 −5.35s 1:56.10 −1.69s 400 / 500 FR F 5:02.59 4:28.79 4:30.06 +1.27s 4:32.61 +3.82s 4:29.68 +0.89s 400 / 500 FR M 4:37.09 4:09.99 4:07.30 −2.69s 4:09.66 −0.33s 4:08.51 −1.48s 800 / 1000 FR F 10:20.49 9:13.79 9:13.79 +0.00s 9:18.98 +5.19s 9:09.10 −4.69s 800 / 1000 FR M 9:34.29 8:40.69 8:32.55 −8.14s 8:37.27 −3.42s 8:35.05 −5.64s 1500 / 1650 FR F 17:14.39 17:40.19 17:35.08 −5.11s 17:43.58 +3.39s 17:30.14 −10.05s 1500 / 1650 FR M 16:05.49 16:38.99 16:24.80 −14.19s 16:32.80 −6.19s 16:30.24 −8.75s 100 BK F 57.09 1:06.79 1:04.57 −2.22s 1:04.32 −2.47s 1:06.15 −0.64s 100 BK M 51.49 1:00.59 58.35 −2.24s 57.70 −2.89s 1:00.93 +0.34s 200 IM F 2:06.39 2:26.19 2:23.49 −2.70s 2:20.73 −5.46s 2:24.11 −2.08s 200 IM M 1:53.89 2:12.79 2:09.62 −3.17s 2:06.21 −6.58s 2:11.36 −1.43s 400 IM F 4:30.69 5:07.29 5:06.87 −0.42s 4:54.19 −13.10s 5:05.51 −1.78s 400 IM M 4:06.99 4:42.39 4:40.56 −1.83s 4:27.33 −15.06s 4:42.27 −0.12s 📌 Conclusion Using the 2026 USA Swimming Futures standards as a benchmark (paired SCY and LCM times), several clear patterns emerge: 1️⃣ Classical is the most stable and consistent Errors are generally small and predictable across all strokes and distances. Provides complete event coverage, including 50s and long-distance freestyle. Performs well across sprint, middle-distance, and distance events. 2️⃣ Performance mode shows larger variance Tends to undershoot LCM times, especially in IMs and longer events. Error magnitude increases with distance. Best viewed as experimental and analytical, not authoritative. 3️⃣ NCAA is accurate where supported — but incomplete Often very close to Futures standards when applicable. Does not support: 50 Back, 50 Fly, 50 Breast SCM ↔ LCM conversions Intended strictly for administrative qualification, not performance analysis. ✅ Practical Takeaway For Swim Standards: Classical is the most reliable default due to its coverage, consistency, and stability NCAA is best used for eligibility and seeding checks Performance should be treated as experimental, useful for comparison but not definitive This is why Swim Standards now defaults to the Classical conversion model, while still allowing users to compare results across all three approaches.
  • Unleash Your Aquatic Style: Dive into the Discussions!

    102 103
    102 Topics
    103 Posts
    swimdealsS
    Whether you’re heading to early-morning lap swim sessions, open-water training, or a weekend at the pool, the THE NORTH FACE Jester Lumbar Pack is a surprisingly practical choice for swimmers who want to keep essentials close, organized, and protected from splashes. [image: 61wYA1GLKBL._AC_SY695_.jpg] Why This Lumbar Pack Works So Well for Swimming 1. Ideal Size for Swim Essentials With 2.2 liters of storage, this pack is perfectly sized for swimmers who travel light. It easily fits: Phone (before and after your swim) Wallet and keys Goggles and swim cap Small sunscreen or anti-chafe stick Energy bar or snack It’s an excellent alternative to hauling a full backpack for short pool visits. 2. Water-Repellent Finish for Poolside Use The non-PFC Durable Water-Repellent (DWR) finish helps protect your belongings from splashes, damp pool decks, and light rain. While not designed to be submerged, it’s very well-suited for wet swim environments where moisture is unavoidable. 3. Hands-Free Convenience Before & After Swims The adjustable strap allows you to wear it: Around your waist while walking to the pool Cross-body when biking or commuting to swim practice This keeps your hands free for carrying towels, kickboards, or pull buoys. 4. Smart Organization for Quick Transitions Swimmers often move fast between locker rooms, decks, and showers. The large main compartment plus external zip pockets make it easy to separate valuables from smaller items like earplugs or locker tokens. 5. Lightweight & Easy to Stash Weighing only 5 oz, the Jester Lumbar Pack won’t feel bulky. It fits easily inside a larger swim backpack if needed, or can be used solo for minimalist swim days. Sustainability Bonus for Eco-Conscious Swimmers This pack qualifies under THE NORTH FACE “Exploration Without Compromise” standards, meaning it’s made with 75% or more recycled, regenerative, or responsibly sourced materials by weight—a nice match for swimmers who care about protecting oceans and waterways. Technical Specs (Swimmer-Relevant) Volume: 2.2 Liters Dimensions: 11" x 5.75" x 4" Strap Length: 19"–49" (adjustable) Average Weight: 5 oz Finish: Non-PFC Durable Water-Repellent Note: Not intended for children 12 and under Best Swim-Related Use Cases Lap swim sessions at indoor or outdoor pools Open-water swim meet check-ins Triathlon training days (pre- and post-swim) Beach or lake swims where minimal gear is needed Pool days when you want to travel light Final Verdict for Swimmers The THE NORTH FACE Jester Lumbar Pack is an excellent pre- and post-swim carry solution. It won’t replace a full mesh swim bag, but for swimmers who want a compact, water-resistant, and wearable option for essentials, it hits a sweet spot between functionality and comfort. 👉 Check current pricing and availability here: View on Amazon Prices are current as of the time of writing and may vary.
  • Fuel, hydrate, and recover the smart way.

    17 17
    17 Topics
    17 Posts
    swimdealsS
    When cravings hit but you don’t want to derail your nutrition goals, Quest Nutrition Chocolate Chip Muffins aim to be the best of both worlds. Designed for people who want more protein, fewer carbs, and minimal sugar, these muffins fit neatly into busy mornings, post-workout snacks, or late-night sweet cravings. [image: 81o3mK2vc6L._SL1500_.jpg] Why Quest Chocolate Chip Muffins Stand Out Quest has built its reputation around protein-forward snacks without excessive sugar, and these muffins follow that philosophy closely. Key Highlights 10g of protein per muffin – convenient fuel for breakfast or snacking Only 2g net carbs – suitable for low-carb lifestyles Less than 1g of sugar – sweet without the sugar spike Soft, bakery-style texture with rich chocolatey flavor Grab-and-go format – no prep required Taste & Texture: Dessert Without the Guilt Unlike many “protein baked goods” that feel dry or artificial, Quest Bake Shop muffins are: Moist and cake-like Loaded with chocolate chips for real dessert appeal Sweet enough to satisfy cravings without being overpowering They’re especially appealing for anyone transitioning away from traditional sugary muffins. Protein That Works for You Quest uses quality dairy-based proteins, which provide essential amino acids your body needs for: Muscle support Satiety between meals Balanced energy throughout the day This makes the muffins a smart option for: Fitness-focused snackers Busy professionals Anyone trying to cut back on sugar without sacrificing flavor When to Enjoy These Muffins These muffins are versatile and easy to fit into daily routines: Breakfast on busy mornings Midday office snack Post-workout protein boost Late-night sweet craving alternative They’re proof that snacking smart doesn’t have to feel restrictive. Price & Value Current price: $13.32 (8-count box, sale) Cost per muffin: Competitive for a high-protein specialty snack Prices are current as of the time of writing and may vary. Final Verdict: Are Quest Chocolate Chip Muffins Worth It? If you’re looking for a low-sugar, high-protein muffin that actually tastes good, Quest Chocolate Chip Muffins are a strong contender. They’re convenient, satisfying, and designed for people who want indulgence without compromise. 👉 Check availability and current pricing here: Quest Nutrition Chocolate Chip Muffins on Amazon Bottom line: Big on protein, low on sugar, and huge on flavor—just like Quest promises.
  • Dive into the latest news and events on swimming around the USA.

    37 62
    37 Topics
    62 Posts
    adamA
    📅 Dates: December 10–13, 2025 (Wednesday–Saturday) 🏟️ Course: Short Course Yards Locations: East: Indiana University Natatorium — Indianapolis, IN West: Lee and Joe Jamail Texas Swimming Center — Austin, TX Entry Deadline: Tuesday, December 2, 2025 at 12 PM (Mountain Time) Qualification Period: November 1, 2024 – December 2, 2025 Eligibility & Entry Notes: Open to USA Swimming athletes age 18 & under on the first day of the meet. Swimmers must compete at their designated East or West site based on LSC. Foreign national teams are not eligible, but foreign athletes registered with USA clubs may participate. Bonus events: Up to two permitted per swimmer who qualifies for at least one individual event. Relays: Timed finals each evening; up to two per team (A/B relays with eight different swimmers). Distance events: Positive check-in required for the 1000 and 1650 Freestyle. Alternate qualifying distances (800/1000 or 1500/1650) accepted. Entry fees: $20 per individual event · $40 per relay · $20 per coach credential ($25 on site). Order of Events Highlights: Day 1: 1000 Free, 200 Medley Relay, 800 Free Relay Day 2: 500 Free, 200 IM, 50 Free, 400 Medley Relay Day 3: 400 IM, 100 Fly, 200 Free, 100 Breast, 100 Back, 200 Free Relay Day 4: 1650 Free, 200 Back, 100 Free, 200 Breast, 200 Fly, 400 Free Relay Awards: Top 3 individual and relay finishers receive medals; top 3 teams (Men, Women, Combined) recognized. Doping Control: Testing conducted under USADA/WADA standards. 📘 Download Official Meet Announcement (PDF): 👉 swimstandards.com/data/2025-winter-jrs-meet-info-9-15-25.pdf ⏱️ View 2025 Time Standards: 👉 swimstandards.com/times/2025-speedo-winter-junior-championships-time-standards
  • 0 0
    0 Topics
    0 Posts
    No new posts.
  • Need help? Ask questions, report issues, or get support here.

    22 63
    22 Topics
    63 Posts
    adamA
    📊 FAQ: Why is an 11-Year-Old Still Ranked in 10-and-Under? Short answer: Rankings are based on the swimmer’s age at the time of the swim, not their current age. How Swim Standards Rankings Work Swim Standards uses season-based rankings, for every swim: The swimmer’s age on the date of that swim determines the age group That swim stays in that age group for the entire season Why This Happens It’s common for swimmers to age up during a season. For example: A swimmer competes in October at age 10 → swim ranks in 10-and-Under The same swimmer turns 11 in December Their earlier swims remain in 10U rankings Any swims after turning 11 appear in 11–12 rankings Because of this, a swimmer may: Appear in both age groups during the same season Still show up in 10U rankings even though they are now 11
As an Amazon Associate, Swim Standards earns from qualifying purchases.