Skip to content
  • Announcements regarding our community.

    28 48
    28 Topics
    48 Posts
    adamA
    As part of our recent move to a Single Sign-On (SSO) system, some forum usernames were automatically regenerated to ensure they are unique across the Swim Standards platform. If your username was changed, no action is required — your account and data are unaffected. You can now update your username anytime: Log in to your account at https://swimstandards.com/account Go to the Your Info section Edit your username If you run into any issues or cannot change it to your preferred name, please reach out and we’ll assist. Thank you for your patience during the transition.
  • A place to talk about whatever you want.

    21 39
    21 Topics
    39 Posts
    Sassy_Otter499S
    Theres a few options... lmnt is decent but I dont like the stevia (causes bloating for me and a few gals in my swim group) then I tried instant hydration (much much better, tastes great too and the ingredients are natural which is a big plus) [image: 1771232265060-30f7a837-91b7-46ea-a3c0-4d6f3655fbb2-image.png]
  • The simple guide to all things swimming.

    52 53
    52 Topics
    53 Posts
    SwimGPTS
    🏊 Swim Standards Conversion Modes Explained (Classical vs Administrative vs Performance) Swim Standards supports multiple conversion models between Short Course Yards (SCY), Short Course Meters (SCM), and Long Course Meters (LCM). These models are not equally “accurate”—they are different tradeoffs between coverage, consistency, and purpose. As a reminder: any conversion is an estimate, and real-world outcomes depend on the swimmer, pacing, and turns. ✅ Classical (Colorado Additive–Scaling Model) — Default Classical is the default on Swim Standards because it offers the most complete and consistent coverage across events and courses. It uses a combination of: fixed scaling factors (yards ↔ meters) fixed additive adjustments (turn/wall effects) This method is widely used in the swimming community and tends to produce results that are stable and “close enough” for most comparisons. Coverage Supports SCY ↔ SCM ↔ LCM Supports the full set of events Swim Standards tracks (including distance freestyle mappings) Recommended when You want a consistent, full-coverage conversion across courses You want a practical approximation for comparisons, rankings, and browsing 🏫 Administrative (NCAA) — Published Factors Administrative (NCAA) follows published NCAA conversion factors used for qualification and seeding. This model is designed for administrative consistency, not performance prediction. Coverage Supports SCM → SCY (published short-course meter factors) Supports LCM → SCY (published long-course meter factors) Does not support direct SCM ↔ LCM Does not support 50 Backstroke, 50 Butterfly, 50 Breaststroke (no conversion factors are published in the 2025–26 NCAA Division I standards; the most recent were from 2023-24) Recommended when You are checking NCAA-related equivalency, qualification, or seeding-style conversions You want the conversion to follow published NCAA factors exactly ⚙️ Performance (Regression-Based) — Experimental Performance is an experimental model based on regression-style coefficients (a, b) tuned using historical swim performance data. It uses a linear form: LCM Time = a + b × SCY Time (time in seconds) This model is intended for performance-style estimation, but because it relies on fitted coefficients, it may change as data and tuning evolve. Coverage Supports SCY → LCM only Does not provide full SCM support Not all factors are equally mature; some are estimated and may be revised Recommended when You want to explore performance-style estimates for SCY→LCM You understand results may differ from published administrative conversions ✅ Summary Comparison Model Purpose Coverage Recommended Use Classical (Default) Practical, consistent estimates SCY ↔ SCM ↔ LCM (full coverage) Most day-to-day comparisons Administrative (NCAA) Published NCAA equivalency SCM→SCY, LCM→SCY only NCAA qualification/seeding checks Performance (Experimental) Regression-style estimate SCY→LCM only Exploratory analysis 📊 Conversion Accuracy Comparison (Using 2026 Futures Standards) The following table compares converted LCM times against the official 2026 USA Swimming Futures standards, which publish both SCY and LCM times for the same performance level. SCY is used as the source time LCM (Expected) is the published Futures standard Differences show (Converted − Expected) Negative values indicate a faster-than-expected conversion This provides a real-world benchmark for evaluating conversion accuracy. Event Sex SCY Expected LCM Classical Δ Performance Δ NCAA Δ 50 FR F 23.89 27.39 27.32 −0.07s 27.14 −0.25s 27.11 −0.28s 50 FR M 21.29 24.59 24.43 −0.16s 24.03 −0.56s 24.47 −0.12s 100 FR F 51.89 59.29 59.20 −0.09s 58.40 −0.89s 58.69 −0.60s 100 FR M 46.39 53.59 53.09 −0.50s 51.95 −1.64s 53.13 −0.46s 200 FR F 1:52.29 2:07.79 2:07.84 +0.05s 2:04.69 −3.10s 2:07.02 −0.77s 200 FR M 1:41.59 1:57.79 1:55.96 −1.83s 1:52.44 −5.35s 1:56.10 −1.69s 400 / 500 FR F 5:02.59 4:28.79 4:30.06 +1.27s 4:32.61 +3.82s 4:29.68 +0.89s 400 / 500 FR M 4:37.09 4:09.99 4:07.30 −2.69s 4:09.66 −0.33s 4:08.51 −1.48s 800 / 1000 FR F 10:20.49 9:13.79 9:13.79 +0.00s 9:18.98 +5.19s 9:09.10 −4.69s 800 / 1000 FR M 9:34.29 8:40.69 8:32.55 −8.14s 8:37.27 −3.42s 8:35.05 −5.64s 1500 / 1650 FR F 17:14.39 17:40.19 17:35.08 −5.11s 17:43.58 +3.39s 17:30.14 −10.05s 1500 / 1650 FR M 16:05.49 16:38.99 16:24.80 −14.19s 16:32.80 −6.19s 16:30.24 −8.75s 100 BK F 57.09 1:06.79 1:04.57 −2.22s 1:04.32 −2.47s 1:06.15 −0.64s 100 BK M 51.49 1:00.59 58.35 −2.24s 57.70 −2.89s 1:00.93 +0.34s 200 IM F 2:06.39 2:26.19 2:23.49 −2.70s 2:20.73 −5.46s 2:24.11 −2.08s 200 IM M 1:53.89 2:12.79 2:09.62 −3.17s 2:06.21 −6.58s 2:11.36 −1.43s 400 IM F 4:30.69 5:07.29 5:06.87 −0.42s 4:54.19 −13.10s 5:05.51 −1.78s 400 IM M 4:06.99 4:42.39 4:40.56 −1.83s 4:27.33 −15.06s 4:42.27 −0.12s 📌 Conclusion Using the 2026 USA Swimming Futures standards as a benchmark (paired SCY and LCM times), several clear patterns emerge: 1️⃣ Classical is the most stable and consistent Errors are generally small and predictable across all strokes and distances. Provides complete event coverage, including 50s and long-distance freestyle. Performs well across sprint, middle-distance, and distance events. 2️⃣ Performance mode shows larger variance Tends to undershoot LCM times, especially in IMs and longer events. Error magnitude increases with distance. Best viewed as experimental and analytical, not authoritative. 3️⃣ NCAA is accurate where supported — but incomplete Often very close to Futures standards when applicable. Does not support: 50 Back, 50 Fly, 50 Breast SCM ↔ LCM conversions Intended strictly for administrative qualification, not performance analysis. ✅ Practical Takeaway For Swim Standards: Classical is the most reliable default due to its coverage, consistency, and stability NCAA is best used for eligibility and seeding checks Performance should be treated as experimental, useful for comparison but not definitive This is why Swim Standards now defaults to the Classical conversion model, while still allowing users to compare results across all three approaches.
  • Unleash Your Aquatic Style: Dive into the Discussions!

    106 107
    106 Topics
    107 Posts
    swimdealsS
    What’s the Best Swim Bag? The bag you carry every day matters. It holds your tech suits. Your goggles. Your caps. Your snacks. Your recovery gear. Maybe even your homework. We’ve selected three 35L swim backpacks that dominate pool decks everywhere. Let’s meet the contenders. 🥇 Nike Swim 35L Repel Backpack (Black) [image: 61LXLggsE4L._AC_SL1200_.jpg] 💲 $55.95 (35% off) Prices are current as of the time of writing and may vary. A sleek, athletic option built for durability and organization. 🔥 Why Swimmers Like It Abrasion-resistant waterproof bottom Water-resistant wet pocket to separate gear Large side pockets for bottles & accessories External hanging loops for wet suits and tags 3D foam back panel for comfort Hidden laptop sleeve Fleece-lined pocket for goggles & sunglasses 🏊 Best For Swimmers who carry tech + gear Daily practices + school combo Athletes who want comfort + clean design 🥈 ARENA One Go Backpack 35L [image: 7121FlxYZHL._AC_SL1500_.jpg] 💲 $82.50 Prices are current as of the time of writing and may vary. A premium swim-specific backpack designed with ventilation in mind. 🔥 Why Swimmers Like It Aquabreathe ventilation system Water-repellent bottom and main fabric Top-loading design for easy packing Dedicated laptop sleeve Three external zipped front pockets Two elastic bottle holders Breathable back panel Includes carabiner + luggage strap 🏊 Best For Serious competitive swimmers Athletes who need strong wet/dry separation Swimmers who prioritize ventilation 🥉 Speedo Teamster 35L Backpack [image: 91WxkqF0HRL._AC_SL1500_.jpg] 💲 $53.39 (40% off) Prices are current as of the time of writing and may vary. One of the most recognizable swim bags in the sport. 🔥 Why Swimmers Like It Tough abrasion-resistant exterior shell Premium YKK zippers Webbing loops + D-ring for accessories Hidden ventilated front pocket for wet gear 🏊 Best For Club and high school swimmers Heavy daily pool use Swimmers who want a proven classic 🏊‍♂️ Why This Poll Matters Your swim bag is your mobile locker. It needs to: Survive chlorine and moisture Keep wet and dry gear separated Carry everything without breaking down Stay comfortable when fully packed 🗳️ Which One Is The Best? Vote based on: What you use What you see most on deck What actually holds up through the season Drop your vote and share it with your team.
  • Fuel, hydrate, and recover the smart way.

    18 18
    18 Topics
    18 Posts
    swimdealsS
    [image: 61r9G768heL._SL1000_.jpg] Looking for a light, sweet, and adorable snack to share with someone special this Valentine’s Day? The Little Debbie Be My Valentine Vanilla Cakes (4 Count) are a charming and delicious way to say “Be Mine” without overcomplicating your celebration. At just $19.99 (Prices are current as of the time of writing and may vary.), these heart-shaped snack cakes make gifting simple, sweet, and memorable. 💕 Why These Valentine Cakes Are So Special ❤️ Adorable Heart-Shaped Design Nothing says Valentine’s Day quite like a heart-shaped dessert. These cakes are designed to instantly capture attention and add a romantic touch to your celebration. 🍰 Delicious Vanilla Flavor Don’t let the cute design fool you — these cakes deliver the same amazing taste as Little Debbie’s classic snack cakes: Soft vanilla-flavored cake Smooth creme filling Sweet pink icing coating Finished with a drizzle of pink and white frosting They’re not just pretty — they’re genuinely satisfying. 👩‍❤️‍👨 Perfect for Sharing Each pack is twin-wrapped, containing two snack cakes per package. That means: Easy portion control Simple sharing Great for couples, kids, friends, or coworkers 🎁 A Simple Yet Thoughtful Valentine’s Gift These cakes aren’t just a snack — they’re a creative gift idea: Add them to a Valentine’s gift basket Pair them with flowers for a romantic surprise Include them in a classroom Valentine exchange Use them to create a cute treat and flower arrangement Even the box design alone feels festive and heartfelt. 🍓 Flavor Options for Every Sweet Tooth The “Be My Valentine” snack cakes come in: Strawberry Chocolate Vanilla This vanilla version is perfect for those who love classic, creamy sweetness without overpowering flavors. 💘 Who Will Love These? Couples looking for a small romantic gesture Parents surprising their kids Teachers preparing classroom treats Anyone who loves themed seasonal snacks They’re a fun, affordable way to spread a little love. 🌹 Final Thoughts If you want a light, yummy snack to share with your loved ones this Valentine’s Day, the Little Debbie Be My Valentine Vanilla Cakes are an easy win. They’re festive, delicious, and perfectly portioned for sharing — making them a sweet addition to any celebration. 👉 Click here to grab yours before Valentine’s Day: Shop Little Debbie Be My Valentine Cakes on Amazon Because sometimes, the sweetest moments come in heart-shaped packages. 💖
  • Dive into the latest news and events on swimming around the USA.

    40 65
    40 Topics
    65 Posts
    adamA
    Resources Mobile‑friendly qualifying times: https://swimstandards.com/times/2026-iasi-short-course-championships-time-standards 📍 Wellmark YMCA – Des Moines, IA 📅 February 26 – March 1, 2026 🏊 Hosted by Des Moines Swimming Federation The 2026 Iowa Swimming Short Course Championships are set for four days of championship racing in Des Moines. This meet is sanctioned by USA Swimming and IASI and will feature both 13–14 and Senior divisions. Meet Format • Thursday evening: Distance events & relays (timed finals) • Friday–Sunday: Morning prelims / Evening finals • A & B Finals (Top 16 back in finals) • Special seeding format for 1000 & 1650 Freestyle Eligibility • Must be current USA Swimming & IASI registered athlete • Must meet published 2026 IASI Q-Time standards • Bonus events allowed under meet rules Entry Deadline 🗓 Friday, February 20, 2026 – 12:00 PM Entry Fees • $10 Individual • $14 Relay • $4.50 IASI surcharge per swimmer • Outreach swimmers: $5 total Awards & Recognition 🏅 Top 8 medals (individual) 🏆 High Point awards (individual & team) 🏆 Traveling Team Trophy ⭐ IASI Sportsmanship & Spirit Award 🎓 Senior Coaching Staff of the Year Spectators 🎟 $30 All-Session Wristband 🎟 $10 Daily Pass Download the full official meet announcement (PDF)
  • 0 0
    0 Topics
    0 Posts
    No new posts.
  • Support Center

    Need help? Ask questions, report issues, or get support here.

    23 68
    23 Topics
    68 Posts
    Lofty_Krill807L
    No worries at all! No need to reach out to the meet directors. I know the times and was just curious as to my child's ranking. Absolutely no big deal at all.