<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Girls 13-14 LCM NAG Record Watch: 2025-2026 Season]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Data current as of April 23, 2026 | Age eligibility cutoff: August 1, 2026 (swimmer remains 13 or 14 as of 8/1/2026)</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto">The Girls 13-14 LCM record book spans nearly five decades of American swimming history. Sippy Woodhead's 1978 200 free sits alongside Grace Koenig-Song's 2024 50 breast. Amanda Beard's breaststroke marks from 1996 share the page with records set as recently as last summer. Against that backdrop, this winter's SCY field — led by the exceptional Finola Whelehan and the versatile Lauren Lonsdale — is one of the more compelling 13-14 classes in recent years.</p>
<p dir="auto">What follows is a candidate-by-candidate look at the current field, built from 2025–26 SCY performance and projected forward using classical conversion. Last-season LCM reference times are included throughout as a real-world check on what the projections actually mean in a 50-meter pool.</p>
<hr />
<h2>Sprint Freestyle</h2>
<h3>50 Freestyle — NAG: 24.98 | Rylee Erisman (2024)</h3>
<p dir="auto">The sprint free field is genuinely fast, but the gap to Erisman's 2024 record is real. All three candidates project in the 26.17–26.41 range — more than a second above the mark — and in the 50 free at 13-14, that distance matters. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/natalia-lesniewski" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Natalia Lesniewska</a></strong> (14) leads at 22.86 SCY (26.17 projected), though her last-season LCM reference of 27.03 puts her over 2 seconds above the record on actual swims. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/zaryna-wardlay" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Zaryna Wardlay</a></strong> (14) follows at 23.02 SCY (26.35 projected), with a last-season LCM time of 26.42 — her real performance is slightly ahead of her own projection, reflecting sound long course efficiency. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/lauren-lonsdale" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Lauren Lonsdale</a></strong> (14) rounds out the group at 23.07 SCY (26.41 projected), with a 26.62 last-season LCM reference.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><em>The record has solid protection — a 1+ second gap in the 50 free at this age is not trivial. This is a developmental watch rather than a near-term threat.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
<h3>100 Freestyle — NAG: 54.03 | Missy Franklin (2009)</h3>
<p dir="auto">Franklin's 100 free has stood for 17 years, and the current field isn't projecting close enough to challenge it this summer. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/natalia-lesniewski" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Natalia Lesniewska</a></strong> and <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/finola-whelehan" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Finola Whelehan</a></strong> (14) lead at nearly identical SCY bests — 49.34 and 49.37 — projecting to 56.37 and 56.40 LCM, both roughly 2.3–2.4 seconds above the record. Whelehan's last-season LCM reference of 56.75 is the most advanced real 100 free LCM time in this group, though it still sits 2.72 seconds short of the mark. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/lauren-lonsdale" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Lauren Lonsdale</a></strong> rounds out the group at 49.68 SCY (56.74 projected), with a 57.37 last-season LCM reference.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><em>The record is comfortably protected. Whelehan leads on real long course performance, but the margin remains clear.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
<h2>Distance Freestyle</h2>
<h3>200 Freestyle — NAG: 1:58.53 | Sippy Woodhead / Claire Weinstein (1978 / 2022)</h3>
<p dir="auto">One of the more unusual records in USA Swimming history — a tie between a 1978 swim and a 2022 performance that matched it exactly. The 200 free is the most interesting event in this dataset. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/finola-whelehan" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Finola Whelehan</a></strong> projects to 1:59.69 from her 1:44.95 SCY — just 0.98% above the record on paper, which is genuinely notable. Her last-season LCM reference of 2:02.08 is the necessary context: she was still 3.55 seconds above the record in actual competition last summer, meaning how much of her winter improvement she carries into 50-meter pools is the key unknown. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/lauren-lonsdale" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Lauren Lonsdale</a></strong> projects to 2:01.40, with a last-season LCM reference of 2:02.73. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/kate-allen" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Kate Allen</a></strong> (14) rounds out the group at 2:02.76 projected, with a 2:06.13 last-season LCM reference.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><em>Whelehan's projection is the most compelling number in the girls dataset — breaking 2:00 LCM at 14 would be a significant achievement. Her 2:02.08 last-season LCM reference sets the realistic starting point. This is the event to watch most closely this summer.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
<h3>400 Freestyle — NAG: 4:07.15 | Sippy Woodhead (1978)</h3>
<p dir="auto">Woodhead's 400 free has survived 48 years of challengers. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/lauren-lonsdale" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Lauren Lonsdale</a></strong> leads at 4:14.46 projected, with a last-season LCM reference of 4:15.61 at Futures Sacramento — her real performance closely matches her projection, and she's already been the closest any current 13-14 swimmer has come to this record in recent memory. That said, 7+ seconds at the 400 free level is still a substantial gap. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/autumn-mcintosh" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Autumn McIntosh</a></strong> (14) projects to 4:17.93, though her last-season LCM reference of 4:32.98 reflects a field that is still developing long course form in this event. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/kate-allen" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Kate Allen</a></strong> is third at 4:18.78 projected, with a 4:26.56 last-season LCM reference.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><em>The record is protected by a meaningful margin. Lonsdale's 4:15.61 last-season LCM time leads the field on real performance — her continued development is the storyline, not the record itself.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
<h3>800 Freestyle — NAG: 8:28.54 | Becca Mann (2012)</h3>
<p dir="auto">All three candidates project well above Mann's mark, with last-season LCM references in the 9:14–9:28 range confirming the field is still building toward this event in long course. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/autumn-mcintosh" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Autumn McIntosh</a></strong> leads at 8:44.49 projected, with a last-season LCM reference of 9:15.68. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/willa-kulp-1" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Willa Kulp</a></strong> (14) and <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/madison-suchecki" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Madison Suchecki</a></strong> (14) follow at 8:56.87 and 8:57.90 projected, with last-season LCM references of 9:14.71 and 9:28.67 respectively.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><em>Mann's record is well protected. The more interesting story is how much of this field's winter improvement carries over to their first long course swims of the summer.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
<h3>1500 Freestyle — NAG: 16:11.98 | Becca Mann (2012)</h3>
<p dir="auto"><strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/autumn-mcintosh" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Autumn McIntosh</a></strong> leads at 16:51.01 projected, with a last-season LCM reference of 17:44.72 — nearly a minute above the record on actual swims. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/lauren-lonsdale" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Lauren Lonsdale</a></strong> follows at 17:01.10 projected, with a 17:34.35 last-season LCM reference. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/harper-rauch" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Harper Rauch</a></strong> (13) rounds out the group at 17:05.10 projected, with a 17:48.73 last-season LCM reference — the youngest candidate here, with the longest runway ahead.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><em>The record is not under pressure this cycle. McIntosh and Lonsdale both project under 17:05 — solid times in their own right, even if Mann's mark remains comfortably distant.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
<h2>Backstroke</h2>
<h3>50 Backstroke — NAG: 28.57 | Phoebe Bacon (2017)</h3>
<p dir="auto"><em>A data note: the top-ranked candidate, Jasmine Phillips (14), shows a SCY time of 17.42 with a projected LCM of 19.94 — consistent with a relay split or non-standard event entry rather than a standalone 50 back. Her last-season LCM reference of 37.60 confirms this. She is excluded from this analysis.</em></p>
<p dir="auto"><strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/noel-defrancisco" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Noel Defrancisco</a></strong> (14) leads at 24.88 SCY (28.22 projected), which clips the record on paper. Her last-season LCM reference of 35.52 makes the context clear: her long course backstroke development is still in early stages, and the projection is well ahead of where she's actually been in a 50-meter pool. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/samantha-engel" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Samantha Engel</a></strong> (14) follows at 25.41 SCY (28.81 projected), with a 40.54 last-season LCM reference.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><em>The last-season LCM references tell the definitive story here. Both candidates are well above the record in real competition — the projections reflect SCY speed, not current long course form.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
<h3>100 Backstroke — NAG: 1:00.26 | Regan Smith (2016)</h3>
<p dir="auto"><strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/finola-whelehan" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Finola Whelehan</a></strong> posts the most eye-catching projection in the entire girls dataset: 1:00.09 from her 53.05 SCY — fractionally under Smith's 2016 mark on paper. Her last-season LCM reference of 1:04.47 provides the realistic context — a 4.21-second gap from her last known long course performance to the record. That's a large step in a single season for the 100 back. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/lillie-dirito" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Lillie Dirito</a></strong> (13) follows at 1:00.77 projected, with a 1:10.13 last-season LCM reference indicating very limited long course backstroke experience. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/lauren-lonsdale" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Lauren Lonsdale</a></strong> is third at 1:01.82 projected, with a more grounded 1:06.08 last-season LCM reference.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><em>Whelehan's SCY backstroke is exceptional and the projection reflects that honestly. But her 1:04.47 last-season LCM time is where the conversation actually starts — the record is a separate target that will require real improvement in long course form.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
<h3>200 Backstroke — NAG: 2:09.16 | Missy Franklin (2009)</h3>
<p dir="auto">The top three projections — 2:12.92, 2:12.96, 2:13.11 — are tightly bunched, all roughly 3–4 seconds above Franklin's record. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/lauren-lonsdale" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Lauren Lonsdale</a></strong> leads on real performance: her last-season LCM reference of 2:15.86 puts her within 6.7 seconds of the record in actual competition, making her the most credible long course 200 back swimmer in this group. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/finola-whelehan" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Finola Whelehan</a></strong> is essentially tied on projection at 2:12.96, but her last-season LCM reference of 2:25.17 reflects very early-season long course exposure in this event. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/lillie-dirito" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Lillie Dirito</a></strong> (13) rounds out the group at 2:13.11 projected, with a 2:26.56 last-season LCM reference.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><em>Lonsdale's 2:15.86 is the most meaningful real data point in this event. The record still has 6+ seconds of real-world protection, but she's the swimmer with actual form here.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
<h2>Breaststroke</h2>
<h3>50 Breaststroke — NAG: 31.80 | Grace Koenig-Song (2024)</h3>
<p dir="auto"><strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/jordan-xanthos" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Jordan Xanthos</a></strong> (14) is the clear standout in breaststroke. Her last-season LCM reference of 32.84 — set at Junior Nationals last July — is 3.27% above the record, and her projection of 32.91 is consistent with that baseline. In the 50 breast a 1+ second gap is real, but racing at Junior Nationals level is meaningful context. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/anna-heumann" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Anna Heumann</a></strong> (14) follows at 33.20 projected, with a 35.62 last-season LCM reference from a January meet. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/emma-fouke" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Emma Fouke</a></strong> (14) is third at 33.21 projected, with a 33.96 last-season LCM reference — the most aligned with her projection of the three.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><em>Xanthos leads this event clearly in both projection and real performance. The record has protection at this level, but she's the swimmer most worth tracking in breaststroke across the summer.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
<h3>100 Breaststroke — NAG: 1:08.09 | Amanda Beard (1996)</h3>
<p dir="auto">A 30-year-old record with a clear cushion over the current field. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/jordan-xanthos" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Jordan Xanthos</a></strong> leads at 1:01.54 SCY (1:10.31 projected), with a last-season LCM reference of 1:12.02 — nearly 4 seconds above the record in real competition. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/payton-garnsey" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Payton Garnsey</a></strong> (14) follows at 1:10.70 projected, with a 1:13.26 last-season LCM reference. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/marina-didenko" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Marina Didenko</a></strong> (14) rounds out the group at 1:10.82 projected, with a 1:13.54 last-season LCM reference.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><em>Beard's record has lasted three decades with good reason. Last-season LCM times in the 1:12–1:13 range tell the story — the field has genuine ground to cover before this mark is under pressure.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
<h3>200 Breaststroke — NAG: 2:25.75 | Amanda Beard (1996)</h3>
<p dir="auto"><strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/maddy-szymanowski" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Madeleine Szymanowski</a></strong> (14) and <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/ziva-liu" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Ziva Liu</a></strong> (14) lead at nearly identical projections — 2:31.24 and 2:31.42 — both roughly 5.5 seconds above the record. Last-season LCM references of 2:36.49 and 2:37.56 confirm that gap is real. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/marina-didenko" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Marina Didenko</a></strong> rounds out the group at 2:32.71 projected, with a 2:40.68 last-season LCM reference.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><em>The record is protected. Szymanowski and Liu are closely matched and both improving — their competition within this group is the more relevant story this summer.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
<h2>Butterfly</h2>
<h3>50 Butterfly — NAG: 26.18 | Claire Curzan (2019)</h3>
<p dir="auto">All three candidates project in the 28.28–28.45 range — roughly 8–9% above Curzan's mark — which is a substantial gap in a sprint event. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/helen-manak" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Helen Manak</a></strong> (14) leads at 24.85 SCY (28.28 projected), with no last-season LCM reference available. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/lizzie-anderson" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Lizzie Anderson</a></strong> (14) follows at 24.98 SCY (28.43 projected), with a last-season LCM reference of 28.69 — her real LCM time is ahead of her own projection, indicating solid long course fly efficiency. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/gianna-mattrey" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Gianna Mattrey</a></strong> (14) rounds out the group at 25.00 SCY (28.45 projected), with a 28.85 last-season LCM reference.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><em>The record is not under pressure from this field. Anderson's long course conversion efficiency stands out within the group, but the gap to the record remains wide.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
<h3>100 Butterfly — NAG: 58.61 | Claire Curzan (2019)</h3>
<p dir="auto"><strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/finola-whelehan" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Finola Whelehan</a></strong> projects to 59.22 — 0.61 seconds and about 1% above Curzan's record. Her last-season LCM reference of 1:01.16 puts her 2.55 seconds above the mark in real competition. That's a meaningful step in the 100 fly for one summer. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/natalia-lesniewski" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Natalia Lesniewska</a></strong> and <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/helen-manak" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Helen Manak</a></strong> both project around 1:02, with last-season LCM references of 1:06.42 and 1:05.85 — both clearly off the pace in real terms.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><em>Whelehan is the only candidate with a projection in the vicinity of the record. The 2.55-second gap from her last-season LCM time to Curzan's mark is a realistic target to monitor, not a prediction. The record is protected; Whelehan is the name to watch.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
<h3>200 Butterfly — NAG: 2:07.01 | Mary Meagher (1979)</h3>
<p dir="auto">A record that has survived 47 years. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/finola-whelehan" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Finola Whelehan</a></strong> projects to 2:10.03 — 3 seconds above the mark — but her last-season LCM reference of 2:29.92 from a May meet reflects very early-season long course 200 fly exposure, making this a developmental baseline rather than a competitive reference. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/marina-didenko" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Marina Didenko</a></strong> and <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/grace-gannon" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Grace Gannon</a></strong> (13) project around 2:17, with last-season LCM references of 2:22.87 and 2:22.35 — more representative of real competitive level.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><em>Meagher's 1979 record is not under meaningful pressure from this field. A 3-second projected gap is real, and last-season LCM references in the 2:22–2:29 range confirm the distance.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
<h2>Individual Medley</h2>
<h3>200 IM — NAG: 2:12.53 | Teagan O'Dell (2021)</h3>
<p dir="auto"><strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/finola-whelehan" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Finola Whelehan</a></strong> projects to 2:12.98 — just 0.45 seconds and 0.34% above O'Dell's record on paper. Her last-season LCM reference of 2:19.61, however, is 7+ seconds above the mark — among the largest projection-to-reference gaps in her entire profile. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/lauren-lonsdale" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Lauren Lonsdale</a></strong> is the more grounded candidate here: her last-season LCM time of 2:15.79 sits 3.26 seconds above the record, and her projection of 2:15.17 closely matches that baseline — a sign that her IM long course form is already well developed. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/kate-allen" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Kate Allen</a></strong> rounds out the group at 2:16.01 projected, with a 2:21.01 last-season LCM reference.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><em>Lonsdale's 2:15.79 is the most credible real-world indicator in this event — she's been closer to the record than either other candidate in actual competition. Whelehan's SCY 200 IM is exceptional, but the LCM version still has a larger gap to close.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
<h3>400 IM — NAG: 4:39.76 | Becca Mann (2012)</h3>
<p dir="auto"><strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/finola-whelehan" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Finola Whelehan</a></strong> projects to 4:42.76 — 3 seconds and 1.07% above the record — but her last-season LCM reference of 5:02.95 reveals just how early in her long course 400 IM development she currently is. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/lauren-lonsdale" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Lauren Lonsdale</a></strong> is again the more grounded comparison: her last-season LCM time of 4:46.27 is actually faster than her current projection of 4:46.81, meaning her real long course 400 IM form is ahead of what conversion math would predict. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/madison-suchecki" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Madison Suchecki</a></strong> rounds out the group at 4:47.67 projected, with a 4:57.74 last-season LCM reference.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><em>The record has real protection. Lonsdale's 4:46.27 last-season LCM time is the most credible real performance in this event — she's already been within 6.5 seconds of the record in actual competition.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
<h2>Overall Picture</h2>
<p dir="auto"><strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/finola-whelehan" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Finola Whelehan</a></strong> (14) is the standout performer in this dataset by SCY metrics, with projections that clip or approach several records. The consistent theme across her profile is a meaningful gap between her SCY form and her current LCM results — most pronounced in the 200 IM, 400 IM, 100 back, and 200 fly. The 2025–26 long course season is a test of how much of her winter improvement she can carry into 50-meter pools. The <strong>200 free</strong> (0.98% projected gap, last-season LCM reference 3.55 seconds above the record) and <strong>100 fly</strong> (1.04% projected gap, last-season LCM reference 2.55 seconds back) are the events where that test is most worth following.</p>
<p dir="auto"><strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/lauren-lonsdale" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Lauren Lonsdale</a></strong> (14) is the more proven long course performer. Her last-season LCM times in the 400 free (4:15.61), 200 IM (2:15.79), 200 back (2:15.86), and 400 IM (4:46.27 — ahead of her own projection) are the most advanced real-world references in those respective events. Her LCM form and her projected times align closely, which is a sign of efficient long course conversion.</p>
<p dir="auto">Event-specific names: <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/jordan-xanthos" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Jordan Xanthos</a></strong> leads the breaststroke field clearly, with a Junior Nationals LCM reference that puts her at the top of the real-performance picture. <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/zaryna-wardlay" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Zaryna Wardlay</a></strong> is worth noting in the 50 free for her LCM efficiency. And <strong><a href="https://swimstandards.com/swimmer/lillie-dirito" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Lillie Dirito</a></strong> (13) in backstroke has two full summers remaining as a 13-14-year-old.</p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><em>All projections use classical SCY-to-LCM conversion. Converted times are estimates only. Last-season LCM reference times are from the 2024–25 season. Age eligibility based on August 1, 2026 cutoff (swimmer remains 13 or 14 as of 8/1/2026).</em></p>
]]></description><link>https://community.swimstandards.com/topic/360/girls-13-14-lcm-nag-record-watch-2025-2026-season</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 13:21:33 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.swimstandards.com/topic/360.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:16:46 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>